![]() In response, people who shared video of the match and player cams - including Hansen - received copyright strikes that were attributed to Nakamura. Other chess commentators noted that Nakamura has previously won games via flagging. Nakamura argued that Hansen should have accepted the draw, and that choosing to continue the game and then winning via flagging was poor etiquette. Both players were streaming the match, making it possible for viewers to see both perspectives. It is a legitimate strategy, although it’s often seen as cheesy by people within the chess community. Nakamura accused Hansen of trying to win via “ flagging,” which is a tactic in which one player simply runs down the other player’s clock while avoiding a checkmate. Nakamura let the clock run out on the Blitz in protest. Nakamura offered Hansen a draw shortly afterward, which Hansen did not see. Hansen offered Nakamura a draw, which Nakamura denied. Hansen and Nakamura had a Blitz match near the end of March in which the two players miscommunicated. Hansen and Nakamura have competed against one another before, as they’re both long-standing members of the competitive chess community. He is a central figure in this drama, along with a smaller streamer, Eric Hansen, a Canadian grandmaster who runs the educational Chessbrah Twitch channel. Chess Champion the biggest chess streamer on Twitch a member of prominent esports organization TSM and the highest-ranked player in Blitz, a speedy version of chess with timers on each turn. One of the most visible figures within the chess community is Hikaru Nakamura. Fans watch countless hours on Twitch each month, with individual streamers racking up tens of thousands of concurrent viewers. The pandemic led to a big boom in popularity for chess thanks to streamers and personalities picking up the game, as well as more online infrastructure for tournaments. That part of the internet is currently on fire thanks to a back-and-forth between two high-level players that includes copyright claims, accusations of harassment, and even a fistfight. This is a Working Draft of the Techniques forĪuthoring Tool Accessibility.Chess is a popular part of Twitch, with an online community that discusses strategies, tournaments, and rankings. It is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or ![]() W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite them as other than "work Rendered obsolete by other documents at any time. This draft follows the working group meeting It isĮxpected that a new working draft will render this draft obsolete in This is work in progress and does not imply endorsement byĮither W3C or members of the WAI Authoring Tool (AU) Working Group. Of changes between successive working drafts is available. Please send comments about this document to the public mailing list: archived at Group are discussed in the WAI AU charter. The techniques introduced here are not required for conformance to the Guidelines and checkpoints from that document it is not a normative reference This document complements the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines. The document contains suggested implementation techniques,Įxamples, and references to other sources of information as an aid toĭevelopers seeking to implement the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines. It is expected to be updated in response to queries These techniques are not necessarily the only way of fulfilling theĬheckpoint, nor are they necessarily a definitive set of requirements forįulfilling a checkpoint. Raised by implementors of the Guidelines, for example to cover new Sent to the working group mailing list at The archive of that Suggestions for additional techniques are welcome and should be In addition, accessible design will benefit many people who do not have a They may have a text-only display, or a small screen.They may not have or be able to use a keyboard or mouse.They may have difficulty reading or comprehending text.Some types of information easily or at all They may not be able to see, hear, move, or may not be able to process.To understand the accessibility issues relevant to authoring tool design,Ĭonsider that many users may be creating documents in contexts very different ERIC HANSEN HYPER BULLET ARCHIVE For example they may be working inĪ noisy environment and unable to hear, or need to use their eyes for another Physical disability but with similar needs. With a small screen, no keyboard and no mouse. ![]() The checkpoint definitions in each guideline This document includes guidelines which are general principles ofĪccessible design. Example techniques, suggestions, and further.References to related guidelines or checkpoints In some cases informative notes, clarifying examples, or cross.Specify requirements for authoring tools to follow the guideline. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |